One of the aims of self-observation - and a key to having an awakened spirit - is to be free of what is sometimes referred to as the "conditioned" self - what we think of as the self we usually accept as it appears to us. If our "self" is the unifying part of our stream of consciousness, what we want is for it to be able to see clearly what we are, to see things objectively - with detachment. What we think of as self has become conditioned by outer influences and inner censorship and is no longer our natural or instinctive self.
Strong feelings are a symptom of our conditioned self - particularly negative ones such as anger, resentment or hatred.
It's very difficult to move our position from subjectivity to objectivity. How can we question our convictions? It's impossible while we remain prejudiced (sure we know what's right) and mechanical (sleepwalking through our lives). Einstein is reported as saying that it is easier to split an atom than a prejudice.
Let's look at our negative feelings towards others and start to learn how to see things differently with a proposition that's hard to take.
Is it possible that our negative feelings toward other people are an illusion? If that's true then we're the ones at fault. Because we're not seeing things as they are. And this taps into a universal truth - we do not see things as they are; we see things as we are. So next time you start criticising somebody or something you might pause to reflect that this criticism can say more about you than it will about what you're criticising.
It's a fact that my life has been filled with some dreadful problems - some of which actually happened.
Hard as it is to accept, there is nothing wrong with the world. So, the world doesn't need to change. I need to change. The idea that the problems in my life are not caused by me but by other people came as a relief. I cannot change others (Boy, have I tried!) but I might be able to change me. And the change I need is a move from my conditioned self (from a prejudiced view of the world and its effect on me) to my real self, detached from prejudice and living free at this particular point in time and space.
So, today, when I am feeling unhappy - particularly when I can see that I am restless, irritable or discontented - I just ask myself "Now, what have I done?" Often I've expected too much, become too attached to something or (all too often, I'm afraid) thought that I know best. I attend to my feelings and perceptions and discover that I am so often the cause of any of my own unhappiness.
It's worth a postscript about righteous anger. What do we do when we see something that is clearly wrong - cruelty to a child perhaps? We act, of course, where we can. But never from a position of righteousness (the cause of most of the world's ills) and preferably without anger, because we seldom see clearly when we are angry.
Image copied from http://get-successful.com/self-concept/
It is interesting that you say that nothing is wrong with the world. I am not sure that I believe that is true.
ReplyDeleteOn the basis that a huge number of people live driven by self will and live unspiritually there is probably something wrong with the world.
If, as you say, there is something wrong with me, then chances are that there is something wrong with at least some other people too.
And unless we assume that there is absolutely no outward behavioural implication of that "something wrong" then at least some of my outward actions must be wrong. And to a greater or lesser extent that must be true for other people too.
How can the sum total of that be that there is nothing wrong with the world?
Even assuming that there is a god and he has a plan the plan must have go awry otherwise there would be no difference between god's will and self will. On the basis that there is self will and it causes problems because it is not the same as god's will it cannot be true that nothing happens in god's world by mistake.
Listen to the Dalai Lama. He will not tell you there is nothing wrong with the world. One of the main things he will highlight is the constant attachment and "craving" of modern society. Oliver James has considered the same thing in his book "Affluenza". And that is just one aspect of parts of the modern world.
Just because there is something wrong with me does not mean that there is nothing wrong with the world. Just because I need to change doesnt mean the world doesnt need to change. It is true that I cannot do anything about the world as a whole I can only do something about me and my effect on it and I will live happier in it if I can do that.
@Nicky
ReplyDeleteI am unable to buy into the argument that the world should somehow be different from the way it is. Surely the world is exactly as it should be. This doesn't mean it's good or that bad things don't happen; people do bad things. Whether it evolved into its current state or whether it's part of God's plan, we have to live with what we find. The alternative choice is to be dissatisfied, which in Buddhist terms is to attach ourselves to the notion that different would be better and would make us happier.
We will have to agree to disagree!!
ReplyDeleteIf I make a judgement it signals the end of my ability to experience the subject of that judgement.
ReplyDeleteAnd given that my experience of the Universe is that it moves.....always.
Yet my subject is not allowed to change - because it threatens my judgement and I can't be right any more.
So a world (or subject) after judgement is dead to me - until the movement of the universe inexorably challenges the judgement and then I'm forced to make a fresh kill.....or a new addition to the Emperor's Wardrobe.
Brand New Judgement - same old Stillborn Illusion.
I think I believe what I'm saying - but I better not be too sure.
BW - luvmarv
@Marv - please can you explain a bit more, I am not sure I understand. Are you saying that if I make a judgement about something I can no longer experience it and cannot suitably react to changes in it?
ReplyDeleteThat because I do not believe the world is absolutely the way it is supposed to be then I cannot experience the world.
Would to make a judgement that the world is exactly the way it is meant to be have the same resultant lack of experience.
@croissantneuf - I have been wondering about whose from perspective things are the way they are meant to be/are exactly as they should be. Is it from god's? As I dont recognise a deity I see things as being just as they are, because there is no overall "meant to be".
@Nicky
ReplyDeleteI don't know whether anything or any deity has the right idea of everything being as it should be. The phrase being used "should be" implies something having the idea. It just [b]is[/b] and I use should to counter the idea we have that life shouldn't be the way it is. Life is as it is; the problem lies with use - having an attitude that life could be improved/better/fairer and so on. The need is to accept life as it is.