28 April 2011

Rabbit, rabbit

Recent conversations I have been involved with about whether things really are "as they should be" has reminded me of a story that I love,  from Awareness by de Mello. It's in a chapter appropriately titled "All's right with the world."

The story concerns a young boy who was walking along side a river when he saw a crocodile trapped in a net. The croc begged him to be freed. The boy protested: "I'm no fool. If I let you out of the net you'll grab me and eat me." 
After much begging and persuasion, the boy finally agrees to take the net off having received a promise that the crocodile won't eat him. But as soon as it can move, the croc grabbed one of the boy's legs in his mouth. The boy started to protest. He begged the crocodile not to eat him, that it wasn't fair and he had done the crocodile a big favour and saved its life. 
The croc said "Don't take it personally. But this is the way the world is. This is the law of life." 
The boy pleaded to a donkey who was watching to reason with the crocodile and spare him. The donkey calmly replied that the crocodile was right, adding "I have been loaded with goods to carry until my back was too weak to carry any more and then thrown out to starve or be eaten because I was no further use to the owner. "This is the way things happen. This is the law of life." 
The boy pleaded to a bird in a tree but she too agreed that the crocodile was right, that his was the way of the world. She told the boy "This morning a snake crept into my nest and ate all my fledglings, one by one, as I watched helpless.. This is the law of life." 
Desperate now, the boy called to a rabbit that was passing and asked his opinion. When he heard what the crocodile had said he suggested that this was an important point they needed to discuss it fully. So, in order to do this we need to all sit and think it through. "So, crocodile," he said "first you'll need to let the boy go so he can take part in our conversation. 
The crocodile protested now "If I do that he'll run away." The rabbit pointed out that the boy wouldn't be able to do that as one slash of the tail would put paid to any escape. And after more protests, the croc finally agreed and loosened his grip on the boy.
The rabbit cried "Quick. Run" and the boy did and escaped narrowly from the croc's tail. But the rabbit called after him. "Wait. Look, you didn't release him fully from the net. Now the people in your village can feast on crocodile meat tonight." And he turned to the crocodile and said, with a smile, "After all, you were right. This  is the way things happen. This is the law of life." 
So the boy went back and brought the villagers back to the river where they slaughtered the crocodile and carved him up and shared out the meat. 
The boy's dog came too and when she saw the rabbit, chased him and snapped his head off. The boy turned, too late to do anything, and as he watched the rabbit dying he said "The crocodile was right. This is the way things happen. This is the law of life."
So perhaps, the problem isn't in reality, in what happens. Maybe the problem is in me.

3 comments:

  1. Sorry to labour the point but this would I think go back to the comments I made on a previous post regarding the effect of self will on the state of the world. What this extract describes as being the way of the world is an illustration of natural principles in this case regarding the food chain and the requirement to eat to survive. Would you feel the same if I posted a story about the last remaining tigers being killed by man purely for fur and said oh well never mind it is the way of the world. It is not the way of the world - it is the way of man's selfishness and self will.

    I am glad we have had this discussion about this as it has prompted me to think a lot and to follow up some readings that I have not looked at for a while. I have decided I am going to stick with the dalai lama on this one. Yes we have to accept that the world is exactly as it is right now but not at all that it is the best way that it can be. For me that creates something of a spiritual apathy and also seems like the wearing of blinkers to make sure I steer well clear of seeing anything that disturbs me. Sometimes it is good to be disturbed.

    So many dalai lama quotes to choose from but I have chosen this one:-

    "We need to think very deeply and hold consultations to come up with some sort of master plan for a better world. Sometimes i think it is a bit idealistic, but I feel our role should be based on the principles of democracy, freedom and liberty. I think the ultimate goal should be a demilitarized world. I feel very strongly about this. This may appear very far, and we may face many obstacles. But if we keep our determination and effort, we may find some way to achieve this goal. I usually call this 'nirvana' or the salvation of humanity. (Address 1991)

    You may not agree with his vision but at least he cannot be accused of lying down and insisting everything is "OK"

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Nicky

    Need for clarity here: the way of the world refers to the world as it is, as I experience it. I will not find happiness while I take a view that the world should be different in some way to suit me. So I need to work past my conditioned self and accept the world as being as I find it.

    But my life is no longer a function of what happens to me. I experience my life - in each moment - as the action I take. So, yes of course, I take action to help other people. Mainly, as I described elsewhere out of enlightened self-interest, but I do help. So I do try to make a difference. But I do not attach my happiness to the outcome because in a future moment I will need to accept the world as it is then. Nothing may have changed externally . But that isn't the issue; I have taken action and I will have changed.

    In the story kind actions are taken. They don't necessarily bring reward, though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think I was coming from a different perspective in that I was not thinking of the world being different to suit me or make me happier. I was thinking more of mankind in general and people who are suffering specifically.

    I also believe it is possible to be happy at the same time as seeing imperfection and need for change. My happiness is not contingent on the external being perfect.

    I accept that the world is exactly as I find it. But that world is not perfect.

    So much in the serenity prayer - accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things i can, wisdom to know the difference. I believe that part of that wisdom is about being able to think about changes that need to happen in me and also think about what happens in the world (human rights for example) and have an opinion on and, where possible, a part in that.

    I dont like the generalisations such as - when I am disturbed there is something wrong with me - there are circumstances where that is true and circumstances where it is not.

    ReplyDelete